Definition: But it was [so, that] in the three and twentieth year of king Jehoash the priests had not repaired the breaches of the house.

Explanation: Okay, let’s break down this verse from 2 Kings 12:6. It’s a really important part of understanding what happened during a period of conflict in ancient Israel. Here's the explanation in simple terms: Basically, this verse tells us about a serious problem that was happening with the temple. “But it was [so, that]…” - This phrase is key. It’s not just saying something happened; it's emphasizing why it happened. It’s like saying “Therefore…”. “…in the three and twentieth year of king Jehoash the priests had not repaired the breaches of the house.” – Let’s unpack that: King Jehoash: This was a powerful king who ruled during a time when Israel was facing serious challenges. The Breaches of the House: This refers to the temple itself, which was a very important place for God's presence and worship. "Breaches" means cracks or damage. So, what does it mean? It means that King Jehoash, after a long period of time, decided not to fix the cracks or damage in the temple. He didn’t repair it. Why was this important? This is a significant event because: It showed a lack of respect for God: Repairing the temple was a fundamental part of religious practice and a way to show reverence to God. Not fixing it suggests a lack of devotion and perhaps even a disregard for God’s will. It led to further trouble: The verse sets the stage for a conflict. It points towards a period of instability and potentially, rebellion against the king. In short, this verse describes a moment where King Jehoash failed to properly care for his temple, which ultimately contributed to a difficult situation. --- Do you want me to: Explain another Bible verse? Discuss the significance of this verse in more detail?